Today, the Philippines remembers the declaration of Martial
Law in 1971 by former President Ferdinand Marcos. As is expected, there are
postage stamps issued by the Philippines during the Martial Law years
glorifying the declaration of Martial Law, and the person of the president and
his first lady.
Even his birthday was commemorated on stamps, something that is
usually done for royalty or deceased people.
I was born after the Revolution that toppled the Marcos
regime took place so I am not in a position to say whether the Philippines was
better off with Martial Law or without. I can only rely on literature that is
available.
Marcos loyalists argue that the discipline brought about by
the Martial Law brought an era of prosperity; on the other hand, those who are
against Martial Law argue that the prosperity was only geared towards those who
are favored by the Marcoses [think cronies]. Neither side is wrong; both
discipline and proper accountability is necessary for a government to work
properly.
The citizens should know and follow the laws of the land;
likewise, the officials who are tasked to implement the law should have the
discipline to implement it consistently and indiscriminately—no exemptions should
be made [even on relatives;]; no person of group should be favored or disadvantaged
[such as what happened to political opponents].
In the same way, citizens and government officials should be
made accountable for disregarding the law—penalties should be imposed
consistently regardless of who is to be penalized. Public spending should come
from proper sources [not stolen from the coffers of political opponents or from
illegal activities] and should be funneled to the appropriate expenses [not to
false NGOs] at the correct amounts [market prices or lower].
There are many more nitty-gritty’s concerning Martial Law
and the two arguments—discipline and accountability—are just generalizations. Nevertheless,
these two would definitely improve the Philippines, if effected.
Perhaps, the question that the Filipinos should debate about
is not whether one leader is better than the other. We should look at how the
current system is working and improve on it—look at the root causes of the
problems and cut them; search for potentials for abuses and eliminate them; identify
the opportunities for corruption and eradicate them.
No comments:
Post a Comment